Location of some executables

Gordan Bobic gordan.bobic at gmail.com
Tue May 10 17:33:45 EDT 2011

On 10/05/2011 22:13, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
> W dniu 2011-05-10 11:48, Fajar A. Nugraha pisze:
>> Personally I agree with that approach, and we should keep it the same
>> for Linux. If you want, you can use zfs for "/" (Darik has posted
>> instructions for doing so in Ubuntu, search list archive if you need
>> it).
> Hello!
> I don't want to have / on zfs (personally, i don't use and don't like
> initrd). I meant two cases:
> a) /usr is on diffrent partition (e.g.) , udev tries executing rules for
> zvol and zpool, but it's doing before localmount service, so can't find
> binaries to run
> b) /usr on zfs, we need to have all tools in /{s}bin/
> <Imho>  the main problem is with hostid (as Alexey said earlier). I'm not
> convinced zfsonlinux should be ideal clone from solaris zfs, what is
> good on solaris, doesn't have to be so good on linux</imho>

What possible justification/reason is there nowdays to have /usr on a 
non-root partition?


More information about the zfs-discuss mailing list