Location of some executables

Gordan Bobic gordan.bobic at gmail.com
Wed May 11 06:42:38 EDT 2011

On 05/11/2011 10:32 AM, Uncle Stoatwarbler wrote:
> On 10/05/11 23:11, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>> On 10/05/2011 22:51, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
>>> W dniu 2011-05-10 23:33, Gordan Bobic pisze:
>>>> What possible justification/reason is there nowdays to have /usr on a
>>>> non-root partition?
>>> I prefer to keep all partition on lvm (except / it have to be placed
>>> on md).
>>> Regards.
>> You still haven't explained what warrants /usr being on a separate
>> partition. For what purpose? What does it gain you?
> FHS allows it. It used to be the norm for small disks and is also
> allowable under BSD, OSX1 and older versions of SYSV (ie, older versions
> of Solaris)

My point is that "allowable" doesn't necessarily mean "useful".


More information about the zfs-discuss mailing list