[zfs-discuss] Re: Phoronic ZFSonLinux performance test
mikko.tanner at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 05:53:08 EDT 2012
On Jun 28, 11:48 am, Gordan Bobic <gordan.bo... at gmail.com> wrote:
> I sense bias in the article. When ZFS is slower than the rest it
> "sucks". But when it blows the opposition away it's "too good to be
> true". I'm most disappointed in Phoronix.
Sadly, Phoronix' "tests" are often garbage, and analysis is not-so-
quite spot-on, as you noticed. Take whatever you see on that site with
a kilo of salt.
See for example Etienne's comments below. They simply don't have the
expertise nor knowledge to conduct professional testing.
More information about the zfs-discuss