[zfs-discuss] ZOL + SATA + Interposers + SAS Expanders is bad Mkay
shadowsor at gmail.com
Fri Oct 11 16:36:30 EDT 2013
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Chris Siebenmann <cks at cs.toronto.edu> wrote:
> | Since SAS support on desktop motherboards seems to be increasing &
> | improving and consumer price of NL-SAS is approaching parity with SATA
> | (at least, so I believe from a quick NewEgg search), I hope we can
> | eventually do away with the SATA altogether.
> We recently went through a preliminary pricing exercise for 2TB 7200
> RPM disks and as far as we could determine the price difference between
> 5-year warranty SATA disks and NL-SAS drives was still enough to be
> prohibitive in bulk for our budget levels.
Yes, if you compare NL-SAS to 'Enterprise' SATA, the cost is almost
negligible ($15 on a ~$350 drive for 4TB), but if you're just
comparing to a SATA disk with a decent feature set like WD Se or Red,
it's still almost double the price (these can be had in 4T for ~$200).
It depends on what your need is though.
> The other wrinkle is SSDs. As far as I could see recently (as part of
> our pricing exercise), affordable SSDs are still all SATA. SAS SSDs are
> all 'enterprise' and therefor very pricy.
> It would be great if all of this changed but I'm not holding my breath.
> My cynical expectation is that HD and SSD companies desperately want to
> hold their price and margins on the 'enterprise' space and will fiercly
> resist lowering prices to the consumer SATA level.
> - cks
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to zfs-discuss+unsubscribe at zfsonlinux.org.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to zfs-discuss+unsubscribe at zfsonlinux.org.
More information about the zfs-discuss