[zfs-discuss] Re: NVMe (NVM express, SATA 3.2) support in ZFS

Gordan Bobic gordan.bobic at gmail.com
Mon Oct 28 03:36:02 EDT 2013

On 10/28/2013 02:07 AM, Uncle Stoatwarbler wrote:
> On 27/10/13 23:37, Andrew Holway wrote:
>>> Going to look at Gentoo soon.
>> Centos seems to be the most reasonable option. I installed the RPMs
>> and was up and running in minutes.
>> Slightly ancient kernels in EL however. I don"t know how much this
>> affects things.
> The version numbers in EL are misleading at best.
> In order to keep thing at the same version number, Redhat heavily
> backport features from newer versions (kernels and other packages),
> which means that you have to be _extremely_ careful about building
> packages for EL systems or assuming that kernel x.y.z really is that old
> internally.

Having ported EL6 to ARM (RedSleeve), I haven't actually found any 
packages that are that are particularly sensitive to kernel versions. 
The closest I have seen to this behaviour is with some 3rd party driver 
sources requiring a kernel newer than a certain version, but this is 
pretty obscure and doesn't apply to anything that ships with EL6.

> Effectively the Redhat environment is a patch nightmare which is only
> consistent if you approach things in exactly the same manner as they do.

If this is a gripe about the build system, I found the Debian build 
system to be worse and more fragile last time I had to get my hands 
dirty with it.

If you are referring to the kernel situation, since most ARM devices run 
with their own, different, proprietary kernels, I have yet to see one 
not work with the RedSleeve userspace due to running a different 
(usually much newer) kernel. For example, running the Samsung Chromebook 
with it's 3.4.0 kernel and RS userspace works lovely, with no issues 


To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to zfs-discuss+unsubscribe at zfsonlinux.org.

More information about the zfs-discuss mailing list