[zfs-discuss] ARM support?

Durval Menezes durval.menezes at gmail.com
Thu Jan 30 06:43:56 EST 2014


Hi Gordan,

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Gordan Bobic <gordan.bobic at gmail.com>wrote:

> It's been a while since I used it so I don't remember and have no easy way
> to check right now, but I'll be running it on my QNAP TS-421 when that
> arrives, so I'll look into it then.
>

No hurry. I'll also be getting a Raspberry Pi in the next few weeks and I
will be sure to test it too.

Cheers,
-- 
   Durval.



>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Durval Menezes <durval.menezes at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Gordan,
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Gordan Bobic <gordan.bobic at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> If memory fragmentation issue were resolved, I think ZFS should be fine
>>> in half a gig of RAM. Fuse implementation is pretty unproblematic on my ARM
>>> machines.
>>
>>
>> This is interesting. In fact, I've run zfs-fuse for a number of years on
>> x86 and it never gave me any memory-related headaches. For curiosity's
>> sake, what kind of VSZ and RSS are you seeing for the zfs-fuse daemon on
>> your ARM machines?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>>    Durval.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Durval Menezes <durval.menezes at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Richard,
>>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2014 3:19 AM, "Richard Yao" <ryao at gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I promised last year that I would fix this. That work is running late,
>>> but expect me to complete it this quarter.
>>>
>>> That will be GREAT, and IMO basically  guarantee ZFS's dominance for
>>> small, "home" NAS systems and the like... depending of course on having
>>> enough available RAM (ZFS on a 512MB raspberry pi would continue to be
>>> elusive for this reason, right?).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> --
>>>    Durval.
>>>
>>> >
>>> > On Jan 29, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Lists <lists at benjamindsmith.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > On 01/29/2014 08:46 AM, Schlacta, Christ wrote:
>>> > >> After seeing this (
>>> http://www.maximumpc.com/amd_flexes_its_first_arm_based_server_soc2014) article, and skipping the relevant references, I feel compelled to ask if
>>> zfsonlinux has support for ARM based processors yet?  If so, Awesome!!  If
>>> not, is someone working on it?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On an only slightly related note, if so, or if so, when will zfs
>>> work on Android?
>>> > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>> send an email to zfs-discuss+unsubscribe at zfsonlinux.org.
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm aware of at least one issue with ZFS on Arm: nearly all Arm
>>> chips are 32 bit, ZFS doesn't play nice with 32 bit architectures. They're
>>> just starting to bridge into 64 bit territory as far as I'm aware.
>>> > >
>>> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>> send an email to zfs-discuss+unsubscribe at zfsonlinux.org.
>>> >
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to zfs-discuss+unsubscribe at zfsonlinux.org.
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to zfs-discuss+unsubscribe at zfsonlinux.org.
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to zfs-discuss+unsubscribe at zfsonlinux.org.
>>>
>>
>>  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to zfs-discuss+unsubscribe at zfsonlinux.org.
>>
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to zfs-discuss+unsubscribe at zfsonlinux.org.
>

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to zfs-discuss+unsubscribe at zfsonlinux.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.zfsonlinux.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20140130/5e1c8c54/attachment.html>


More information about the zfs-discuss mailing list