[zfs-discuss] Stable ZFS releases

Gordan Bobic gordan.bobic at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 14:48:20 EDT 2018


The thing you need to consider is that there are a lot of known bugs that
have been fixed since 0.6.x.

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Gionatan Danti via zfs-discuss <
zfs-discuss at list.zfsonlinux.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> this recent regression [1] make me wonder what ZoL relase to use for
> maximum stability and data safety.
>
> I generally do some in-lab testing of the packaged RHEL/CentOS version
> and, if all *seems* to work fine, I push it on production machines. The key
> word here is "seems": some bug require extensive testing, and it is
> entirely possible that for them to pass my lab testing.
>
> I noticed that Ubuntu and Debian provide the latest 0.6.x release in their
> repositories.
> What ZoL relase are you running on production machine? Should I restrict
> myself to 0.6.x releases?
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1] https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/7401
>
> --
> Danti Gionatan
> Supporto Tecnico
> Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
> email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it
> GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss at list.zfsonlinux.org
> http://list.zfsonlinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.zfsonlinux.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20180410/8deff546/attachment.html>


More information about the zfs-discuss mailing list