[zfs-discuss] list_del corruption ->next is LIST_POISON1
lazyvirus at gmx.com
Mon Nov 12 23:23:44 EST 2018
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:47:55 -0500
Pascal Meunier <pmeunier at purdue.edu> wrote:
Possibly, but I don't know which patches have been added in which
distro in V.5 :/
But I remember that in old times, it worked even with some unknown
chipsets, if it doesn't, it'll say so.
I also remember an (quite old) article saying that even if the ECC
funtion wasn't tested, it was able to find errors masked by it.
You can also take a look at:
about the kernel EDAC and RAM status
> Thanks for the suggestion, the server has ECC, and MCE has not
> reported any memory or any hardware errors for that matter. Would
> 'memtest86+' be able to detect something that ECC + MCE monitoring
> would miss?
> On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 23:49 +0100, Bzzzz wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:53:29 -0500
> > Pascal Meunier via zfs-discuss <zfs-discuss at list.zfsonlinux.org>
> > wrote:
> > Did you installed 'memtest86+', rebooted and chosen it instead of a
> > kernel AND let it run at least 3 times ALL of its tests to check that
> > your RAM has no visible problem ?
> > JY
More information about the zfs-discuss